[1] Abdo, J.M., Sopko, N.A. and Milner, S.M. The applied anatomy of human skin: A model
for regeneration. Wound Med., 28 (2020), 100179.
[2] Anissimov, Y.G. and Roberts, M.S. Modelling dermal drug distribution after topical appli-
cation in human. Pharm Res., 28 (2011), 2119–2129.
[3] Azhdari, E. and Emami, A. Swelling effect of microneedle in the skin drug delivery using
Stephan condition: Analytical and numerical study. Ric. Mat., (2024), 1–28.
[4] Azhdari, E. and Naghipoor, J. The effect of viscoelasticity of the tissue on the magneto-
responsive drug delivery system. J. Math. Biol., 84(13) (2022), 1–26.
[5] Benbrook, N. and Zhan, W. Mathematical modelling of hollow microneedle-mediated trans-
dermal drug delivery. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res., 15 (2025). 3226–3251.
[6] Calcutt, J.J., Roberts, M.S. and Anissimov, Y.G. Predicting viable skin concentration: Mod-
elling the subpapillary plexus. Pharm Res., 39 (2022), 783–793.
[7] Cárcamo-Martínez, Á., Mallon, B., Domínguez-Robles, J., Vora, L.K., Anjani, Q.K. and
Donnelly, R.F. Hollow microneedles: A perspective in biomedical applications. Int. J.
Pharm., 599 (2021), 120455.
[8] Chen, D., Yin, S., Lu, X., Fu, H., Gao, H. and Zhang, S. Research on the correlation between
skin elasticity evaluation parameters and age. Cosmetics, 11(6) (2024), 205.
[9] Davis, S.P., Martanto, W., Allen, M.G. and Prausnitz, M.R. Hollow metal microneedles for
insulin delivery to diabetic rats. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 52 (2005), 909–915.
[10] Eikenberry, S. A tumor cord model for Doxorubicin delivery and dose optimization in solid
tumors. Theor. Biol. Med. Model., 6 (2009), 16.
[11] Everett, J.S. and Sommers, M.S. Skin viscoelasticity: Physiologic mechanisms, measurement
issues, and application to nursing science. Biol. Res. Nurs., 15(3) (2013), 338–346.
[12] Ferreira, J.A., Grassi, M., Gudino, E. and de Oliveira, P. A 3d model for mechanistic control
drug release. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 74 (2014), 620–633.
[13] Ferreira, J.A., Grassi, M., Gudiuo, E. and de Oliveira, P. A new look to non-fickian diffusion.
Appl. Math. Model., 39 (1) (2015), 194–204.
[14] Ferreira, J.A., Jordão, D. and Pinto, L. Drug delivery enhanced by ultrasound: Mathematical
modeling and simulation. Comput. Math. Appl., 107 (2022), 57–69.
[15] Ferreira, J.A., Naghipoor, J. and de Oliveira, P. A coupled non-fickian model of a cardio-
vascular drug delivery system. Math. Med. Biol., 33(3) (2016), 329–357.
[16] Ferreira, J.A., Pinto, L. and Santos, R. Numerical analysis of a porous-elastic model for
convection enhanced drug delivery. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 339 (2022), 113719.
[17] Goyal, R., Macri, L.K., Kaplan, H.M. and Kohn, J. Nanoparticles and nanofibers for topical
drug delivery. J. Control Release, 240 (2016), 77–92.
[18] Jacquet, E., Chambert, J., Pauchot, J. and Sandoz, P. Intra-and inter-individual variability
in the mechanical properties of the human skin from in vivo measurements on 20 volunteers.
Skin Res. Technol., 23 (2017), 491–499.
[19] Lee, H., Song, C., Baik, S., Kim, D., Hyeon, T. and Kim, D-H. Deviceassisted transdermal
drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 45 (2018), 127–135.
[20] Li, M., Vora, L.K., Peng, K. and Donnelly, R.F. Trilayer microneedle array assisted trans-
dermal and intradermal delivery of dexamethasone. Int. J. Pharm., 612 (2022), 121295.
[21] Lotfollahi, Z. The anatomy, physiology and function of all skin layers and the impact of
ageing on the skin. Wound Pract. Res., 32(1) (2024), 6–10.
[22] Machekposhti, S.A., Soltani, M., Najafizadeh, P., Ebrahimi, S.A. and Chen, P. Biocompat-
ible polymer microneedle for topical/dermal delivery of tranexamic acid. J. Control Release,
261 (2017), 87–92.
[23] McLean, K. and Zhan, W. Mathematical modelling of nanoparticle-mediated topical drug
delivery to skin tissue. Int. J. Pharm., 611 (2022), 121322.
[24] Muliana, A. and Rajagopal, K.R. Modeling the response of nonlinear viscoelastic biodegrad-
able polymeric stents. Int. J. Solids Struct., 49 (2012), 989–1000.
[25] Nekouzadeh, A., Pryse, K.M., Elson, E.L. and Genin, G.M. A simplified approach to quasi-
linear viscoelastic modeling. J. Biomech., 40 (2007), 3070–3078.
[26] Palacio-Torralba, J., Hammer, S., Good, D.W., McNeill, S.A., Stewart, G.D., Reuben, R.L.
and Chen, Y. Quantitative diagnostics of soft tissue through viscoelastic characterization
using time-based instrumented palpation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 41 (2015), 149–
160.
[27] Phatale, V., Vaiphei, K.K., Jha, S., Patil, D., Agrawal, M. and Alexander, A. Overcoming
skin barriers through advanced transdermal drug delivery approaches. J. Control Release, 80
(2022), 351–361.
[28] Prausnitz, M.R., Mitragotri, S. and Langer, R. Current status and future potential of trans-
dermal drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3 (2004), 115–124.
[29] Prausnitz, M.R. and Langer, R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol., 26 (2008),
1261–1268.
[30] Rippa, A.L., Kalabusheva, E.P. and Vorotelyak, E.A. Regeneration of dermis: Scarring and
cells involved. Cells, 8(6) (2019), 607.
[31] Soares, J.S. and Zunino, P. A mixture model for water uptake, degradation, erosion and
drug release from polydisperse polymeric networks. Biomaterials, 31 (2010), 3032–3042.
[32] Wu, Y., Hutton, A.R.J., Pandya, A.K., Patravale, V.B. and Donnelly, R.F. Microneedle
and polymeric films: Delivery of proteins, peptides and nucleic acids. Drug Deliv. Target.,
(2023), 93–111.
[33] Wu, D.C. and Ofner, C.M. Adsorption and degradation of doxorubicin from aqueous solution
in polypropylene containers. AAPS PharmSciTech, 14 (2013), 74–77.
[34] Yadav, P.R., Munni, M.N., Campbell, L., Mostofa, G., Dobson, L., Shittu, M., Pattanayek,
S.K., Uddin, v. and Das, v. Translation of polymeric microneedles for treatment of human
diseases: Recent trends, progress, and challenges. J. Math. Biol., 84(8) (2021), 1132.
[35] Zhan, W. Mathematical modelling of drug delivery to solid tumour. Imperial College London,
2014.
