H. Mahdizadeh


In this paper a novel Godunov-type finite volume technique is presented for the solution of one-dimensional Euler equations. The numerical scheme defined herein in is well-balanced and approximates the solution by propa gating a set of jump discontinuities from each Riemann cell interface. The corresponding source terms are then treated within the flux-differencing of the finite volume computational cells. First, the capability of the numerical solver under gravitational source term is examined and the results are val dated with reference solution and higher-order WENO scheme. Then, the well-balanced property of the scheme for the steady-state is tested and finally the proposed method is employed for the modeling small and large amplitude perturbation imposed to the polytropic atmosphere. It is found out that the defined well-balanced solver provides sensible prediction for all of the given test cases.

Article Details

1. Bale, D. S., LeVeque, R. J., Mitran, S. and Rossmanith, J. A. A wave propagation method for conservation laws and balance laws with spatially varying flux functions, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 (3) (2003), 955–978.
2. Botta, N., Klein, R., Langenberg, S.and Lutzenkirchen, S. Well balanced finite volume methods for nearly hydrostatic flows, J. Comput. Phys. 196 (2004), 539-565.
3. Chandrashekar, P. and Klingenberg, C. A second order well-balanced finite volume scheme for euler equations with gravity SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37(3) (2015) B382–B402.
4. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K. O. and Lewy, H. Uber die partiellen differenzeengleichungen der mathematischen physik. Mass.Ann. 100 (1928) 32–74.
5. KAppeli, R. and Mishra, S. Well-balanced schemes for the euler equa-tions with gravitation J. Comput. Phys. 259 (Supplement C) (2014), 199–219.
6. LeVeque, R. J. Balancing source terms and flux gradients in highresolution godunov methods: The quasi-steady wave-propagation algorithm J. Comput. Phys. 146 (1998), 346–365.
7. LeVeque, R. J., Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems Cambridge University Press, 2002.
8. LeVeque, R. J. and Bale, D. S. Wave propagation methods for conserva tion laws with source terms In: in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems (1998), pp. 609–618.
9. Li, G. and Xing, Y.,High order finite volume WENO schemes for the euler equations under gravitational fields J. Comput. Phys. 316 (2016), 145–163.
10. Luo, J., Xu, K. and Liu, N. A well-balanced symplecticity-preserving gas kinetic scheme for hydrodynamic equations under gravitational field SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 (5) (2011), 2356–2381.
11. Mahdizadeh, H., Stansby, P. K. and Rogers, B. D. On the approximation of local efflux/influx bed discharge in the shallow water equations based on a wave propagation algorithm Int J. Numer. Methods. Fluids. 66 (10)(2011), 1295–1314.
12. Mahdizadeh, H., Stansby, P. K. and Rogers,B. D. Flood wave modeling based on a two-dimensional modified wave propagation algorithm coupled to a full-pipe network solver J. Hydraul. Eng. 138 (3) (2012), 247–259.
13. Press, W. H., ATeukolsky, S., Vetterling, W. T. and Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 Cambridge University Press, 1992.
14. Roe, P. Approximate riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes J. Comput. Phys. 43 (2) (1981), 57–372.
15. Tian, C., Xu, K., Chan, K. and Deng, L. A three-dimensional multidimensional gas-kinetic scheme for the navierˆastokes equations under grav itational fields J. Comput. Phys. 226 (2) (2007), 2003– 2027.
16. Toro, E. F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics Springer, 1997.
17. Toro, E. F., Castro, C. E. and Lee, B. J. A novel numerical flux for the 3d euler equations with general equation of state J. Comput. Phys. 303 (2015), 80–94.
18. Xing, Y. and Shu, C.-W. High order well-balanced weno scheme for the gas dynamics equations under gravitational fields J. Sci. Comput. 54 (2)(2013), 645–662.
How to Cite
مهدیزادهح. (2018). A modified flux-wave formula for the solution of one-dimensional Euler equations with gravitational source term. Iranian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Optimization, 8(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijnao.v8i2.59531